I
have been in Detroit over the weekend. ..When it comes to power growing up, I
was at the mercy of the parents, teachers, and whatever authority felt like
taking control. The specific one I will focus on is the parent child
relationship. I will try to make this a bit broad as there may be value in a
few stories.
So
there is the obvious one. My parents often tell us to clean the house or cut
the grass. After that, there is minor supervision until work is either not
getting done (sometimes a form of wrathful chaos ensues) or something needs to
be clarified. Then the task is completed. But there is a certain amount of
freedom in delegating tasks within the three children and that sometimes
includes the father of the household. There is a certain amount of freedom in
who gets to do what. It is often an attempt to come up with something fair. One
individual gets the larger set of grass to cut, while the other has the
wonderful task of PUP (picking up poop), one of the disadvantages of a dog.
Anyway the tasks are then completed with the amount of effort and detail the
individual inputs into the action. There
is a certain amount of authority under the authority of the parents when it
comes to cleaning.
My
next example is a story from my childhood, which may apply. We had grown
pumpkins when we were younger and do to a surplus of pumpkins, our mother
instructed us to go out and give the block of neighbors our extras. These were
some solid pumpkins. Well, it turns out people are suckers for three small
children giving away large orange spherical gourds. Our neighbors began offering payment for our
door to door delivery. While we were instructed to give them away, we took it a
bit farther and began to make up some prices for our pumpkins. I guess we took a certain amount of authority
into our own hands even though it was not designated for us. We made everything
up on the fly and became door to door sales munchkins. I remember making a fairly
good profit too. Of course everything was reversed once we got back to our head
authority with an unexpected supply of dollars. We were required to return our well
earned dollars. I guess the purpose of the pumpkins was just to be nice and
nothing was expected in return. (Possibly favor within the neighborhood, but I
think it was genuine selflessness)
My guess for relation to economics is
that this is to demonstrate that leaders cannot control everything, and there
is often going to be some responsibility that falls on individuals in non
leadership positions. This sort of falls right after the idea of monitoring.
Now we are going to assume some unexpected leadership will fall on the lower
levels that we accept as part of the normal process. Maybe we will be analyzing
what the effects of this are. Or we will just talk about it.
Note that we are discussing the politics section of B&D on Thursday and the prompt was to get you set up for that. Politics is intimately tied to economics, but we frequently we them as distinct domains. Apart from the expression "market power" we typically don't talk about power in economics. But we do in politics. In your post you use the word authority, but not the word power. You should try to distinguish the two. Authority stems by virtue of position, while power arises from circumstance. Typically, people in authority have some power, but having power doesn't mean you have authority.
ReplyDeleteIn this situation, though, don't the parents have power by virtue of the circumstances? They can take the kids' "income" away and give it back to the neighbors if need be. They have authority as parents, and can use power to take away privileges and make the children listen. If the kids were older and feeling rebellious, they may do their own thing even if they are punished, whereas when they are younger they may be less likely to exercise a strong will (Terrible Twos excluded). In a situation such as that, it would seem the parents have authority, but less or no power.
ReplyDeleteWhile highly individual, I think the stereotype that parents have more power to enforce their authority even against the children’s as they are younger and more dependent on them seems to apply here