First, I wanted to apologize for the delayed response. I
expected there to be a prompt, but I know “no excuses”. I realize that this
will not be the case and in fact I am beginning to appreciate the ability to be
creative with the whole concept. Also in response to professor’s post about his
responses, the interesting part for entrepreneurship is learning the managing
process and its dynamics.
As I
attempted to reflect on the past weeks classes I realized that besides my
memory being not quite where I wished it was, is that my lack of reading really
will provide me no benefit. In honesty, I wasn’t sure what was supposed to be
read and to make an informative thoughtful blog post I needed to prepare much
better. Oh well, it’s a growing process.
Just
off of memory, the thing that stuck out to me was what we discussed about
horizontal and vertical integration. I think that if I were to make an educated
guess the answer to what people are looking for is horizontal organization.
After all we want to be known, our ideas to make a difference. Yet with all of
this, we settle for the farm system approach. College and our grades determine
what firm will be placed in and how high up we are placed. To tell you the
truth, I am not sure which one is better for the success of a business or
organization or where do we draw the line. That might be a question that we discuss that
I am sure I would find interesting. Personally just sitting here I know there
will be a true answer as seems to be the case for many economic, political and
abstract policies. It is always about context.
The
part I feel is what I am most interested out of the four frames that we
discussed would be the human resource area. I believe that life is really about
people and while structure, politics and symbolism have a place. The point of
organization is motivating and getting people to do something they are
legitimately passionate about and that that idea will drive them even when they
might not appreciate the short term task. So my belief that the focus of any
organization I run is building a passion and a belief in people. It is probably
a bit romantic of a view but why should I strive for anything less? As we discussed
in class, professor is an intellectual and so he pursues places and ways to
develop what he cares about. So I guess
my idea here is that human resources should be prioritized as the number 1
starting framework. I also feel like
symbolism contributes pretty heavily. What are you conveying? Is it a friendly
atmosphere where creativity and innovation are embraced. I probably lay on the
opposite spectrum of a good mathematical, theoretical driven economist. I
understand the importance of the politics and structure because without some
sort of regulation people’s natural tendencies may not be towards the maximum
productivity.
I do not feel as though I have much to add to the idea of transaction
costs and our Hudson Bay activity.
On the prompt - in the calendar, these are on Friday mornings at 9:30. Once Friday passes, the prompt no longer shows up in the sidebar of the blog. You have to go to the calendar itself to show it.
ReplyDeleteEven if you have a passion for people, and it is good to have that, you need to be concerned with certain structural issues as well. For example, how do you determine if you have the right number of staff, given the workload for your organization? A second issue, related to that one, is when you do hire new people, what skill sets will you look for?
I think you'll find that all the frames are useful. And I hope the economics approach will give you some insight too. We really are just setting things up now. So I hope you can be a little patient for the gems that should emerge in the next few weeks.