Actually my story is quite similar to Paul’s, from class, in that
I have always been fascinated with entrepreneurship. This originated at an
early age (say about 9 or 10) messing with producing different kinds of goods
in gardens and gathering bait to sell for fishing ( a business which never quite got off
the ground). I even attempted to write
contracts for my brother and sister. Though I left that realm for quite some
time, Professor Paul Magelli instilled that same fire what feel like infinitely
more when I took his class junior year. Since then though I am leaning towards
a non for profit because it seems to fit my direction much better, I am
considering what running my own organization might entail. Therefore the
economics of organizations seem to make complete sense.
As for my own personal experience I have not been
able to dabble in the private industry but have been fortunate enough to work
for the University in both the parking department and the athletic department. Each
department has its own quirks. To be quite blunt they don’t seem to like each other.
They operate much differently, athletics being more lax, wasteful, yet quite
creative, while parking is a bit more uptight and stingy. Not to say that one
is better but the people in these organizations look and carry themselves
differently. I have also worked for a forest preserve garage which also has
slightly different dynamics than the two previously mentioned jobs.
Unfortunately I have very little experience with clubs and registered student
organizations at the collegiate level.
My original expectations for the course would simply
be that I come out with a few tips and pointers on how to make people work
together within an organization. Maximizing decisions and putting together a
slightly dynamic model on how an organization is built, specifically more along
the lines of the human resource department. Now I am beginning to think that we
may include a bit more involving partners and how outside groups like
independent contractors effect the way organizations are run. From the first
two classes, I have yet to be able to determine what we are really going to
talk about. The first stuff was quite basic, there are independent contractors
like test administers which have advantages like being standardized and one can
hire employees like Illinois which help promote a brand yet are differentiated.
The other stuff has been a bit more confusing as to
the direction we are taking as a class. I have a hard time seeing how diploma
bills, teacher ratings within departments, and students grade point average is
going to play a part with organizations. The music piece while quite fascinating,
will be remembered simply as a piece on the evolution of music. Maybe we will
dive further into that in our next class discussion. I am not worried as to
where the class is headed/ At least I have been intrigued initially and that is
really all one can ask for during syllabus week. One thing I am really quite
excited about is our class size, which is the smallest I have been a part of
during my time at University of Illinois.
No comments:
Post a Comment